See also my tech blog.
| /* -*- mode: c; -*- */ | |
| /* ========================================================================= * | |
| * | |
| * This file has been written in order to easily wrap existing C programs, | |
| * and test their runtime. | |
| * | |
| * It simply runs `main' of the wrapped program repeatedly, and provides an | |
| * average of timed runs. Whatever it is that you actually want to time | |
| * should be placed there, which is not always ideal for large existing |
| #include <time.h> // Robert Nystrom | |
| #include <stdio.h> // @munificentbob | |
| #include <stdlib.h> // for Ginny | |
| #define r return // 2008-2019 | |
| #define l(a, b, c, d) for (i y=a;y\ | |
| <b; y++) for (int x = c; x < d; x++) | |
| typedef int i;const i H=40;const i W | |
| =80;i m[40][80];i g(i x){r rand()%x; | |
| }void cave(i s){i w=g(10)+5;i h=g(6) | |
| +3;i t=g(W-w-2)+1;i u=g(H-h-2)+1;l(u |
I screwed up using git ("git checkout --" on the wrong file) and managed to delete the code I had just written... but it was still running in a process in a docker container. Here's how I got it back, using https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pyrasite/ and https://pypi.python.org/pypi/uncompyle6
apt-get update && apt-get install gdb
Putting cryptographic primitives together is a lot like putting a jigsaw puzzle together, where all the pieces are cut exactly the same way, but there is only one correct solution. Thankfully, there are some projects out there that are working hard to make sure developers are getting it right.
The following advice comes from years of research from leading security researchers, developers, and cryptographers. This Gist was [forked from Thomas Ptacek's Gist][1] to be more readable. Additions have been added from