| Criteria | Playwright Codegen | Playwright with AI (Playwright MCP with Claude or GitHub Copilot) |
|---|---|---|
| How it works | Records user interactions and generates scripts based on browser actions. It can also automatically generate toBeVisible() assertions. |
Generates and executes tests based on natural language prompts. |
| Input Method | Manual interaction with the browser (click, type, navigate). | Instructions are provided in plain English text describing the test scenario. |
| Understanding Context | Does not understand business logic, only records actions. | It can understand context, business rules, and expected outcomes from prompts. |
| Speed of Test Script Creation | The automation scripts are automatically generated after the user interacts with the website. | As soon as the user inputs the prompt, the test scripts and execution begin. |
| Exploratory Testing | Not suitable for exploratory |
| Criteria | PATCH | PUT |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Partially updates a resource | Completely replaces a resource |
| Request Body | Only includes fields that need to be updated | Requires the full resource representation |
| Data Sent | Only changed fields | Entire data payload |
| Idempotency | Not always idempotent | Always idempotent |
| Use Case | Updating specific fields | Replacing an entire record |
| Risk of Data Loss | Low, as t |
| Criteria | PUT | POST |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | It is used to update or replace an existing resource entirely. | It is used to create a new resource or submit data to a resource. |
| Idempotency | It is Idempotent, multiple identical requests result in the same outcome. | It is not idempotent, multiple identical requests may create multiple records. |
| Response Status Code | Commonly returns 200 OK with updated resource. | Commonly returns 201 Created with the new resource details. |
| Use Case Example | Updating a user’s profile information. | Creating a new user account. |
| Criteria | Gherkin | Cucumber |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | A Domain-Specific Language (DSL) | A test automation tool/framework |
| Purpose | To explain the business feature in plain text | To execute the behaviour specified in the feature files as automated tests |
| File Format | Uses .feature file format (contains test scenarios) |
Uses .java, .rb, .js files (step definition files) |
| Syntax | Feature, Given, When, Then, And/But, Scenario, Examples, etc. | Uses programming language syntax |
| Dependencies | None – Just uses plain text | Depends on the programmi |
| Interface Name | .xls Implementation Class Name | .xlsx Implementation Class Name |
|---|---|---|
| Workbook | HSSFWorkbook | XSSFWorkbook |
| Sheet | HSSFSheet | XSSFSheet |
| Row | HSSFRow | XSSFRow |
| Cell | HSSFCell | XSSFCell |
| Programming Language | Exception Name |
|---|---|
| Java | ElementClickInterceptedException |
| C# | OpenQA.Selenium.ElementClickInterceptedException |
| Ruby | ERROR: element click intercepted |
| Python | selenium.common.exceptions.ElementClickInterceptedException |
| JavaScript | WebDriverError: element click intercepted: |
| Criteria | Sanity Testing | Regression testing |
|---|---|---|
| Goal | The goal of sanity testing is to check that the application is stable enough to proceed with further testing of the entire application. | The goal of regression testing is to ensure that the new code changes does not break the existing functionality of the software. |
| Scope | The scope of sanity testing is to verify only the specific functionality, verifying the bug fix or configuration or environment related changes. | Regression testing covers overall software or critical features of the software to verify everything is working as expected. |
| When Performed? | Sanity testing is performed after minor bug fixes, enhancements or before getting into comprehensive testing. | Regression testing is performed after a new feature is added to the software or major rework is done. |
| Test Cases Used | Basic functional test cases like |
| Criteria | Smoke Testing | Regression testing |
|---|---|---|
| Goal | The goal of smoke testing is to uncover the critical or blocker issues in the application using the test cases that cover important functionalities of the software. | The goal of regression testing is to ensure that the new code changes does not break the existing functionality of the software. |
| Scope | Smoke testing verifies the stability of the software by testing critical user journeys of the software. | Regression testing covers overall software features to verify if everything is working as expected. |
| When Performed? | Smoke testing should be performed after a new build is released after major code changes. | Regression testing is performed after a new feature is added to the software or major rework is done. |
| Test Cases Used | Test Cases related to critical functionalities of the software are used in |
| Criteria | Regression Testing | Retesting |
|---|---|---|
| Goal | The goal of regression testing is to make sure that the new code changes does not break the existing functionality of the software. | The goal of retesting is to make sure that the reported bug has been fixed after code changes. |
| Scope | Regression testing covers overall software or critical features of the software to check if everything is working as expected. | Retesting covers only the specific failed test case or scenario. |
| When Performed? | Regression testing is performed after a new feature is added to the software or major rework is done. | Retesting is performed after the failed test cases are fixed. |
| Test Cases | Regression testing considers the passed as well as failed test cases to check the overall stability of the software. | Retesting covers only the specific failed test cases/scenarios. |
| Example | Adding new option to si |
| Criteria | Smoke Testing | Sanity Testing |
|---|---|---|
| Goal | The goal of smoke testing is to uncover the critical or blocker issues in the application using the test cases that cover important functionalities of the application. | The goal of sanity testing is to check that the application is stable enough to proceed with further testing of the entire application. |
| Scope | The scope of smoke testing is to check the stability of the application by testing critical user journeys of the software. | The scope of sanity testing is to check only the specific functionality, verifying the bug fix or configuration or environment related changes. |
| When Performed? | Smoke testing should be performed after a new build is released after major code changes. | Sanity testing is performed after minor bug fixes, enhancements or before getting into comprehensive testing. |
| Test Cases | Test Ca |
NewerOlder