Starting from macOS 15, sudo spctl --master-disable is no longer supported to disable Gatekeeper.
We need to disbale it with Configuration Profiles.
.mobileconfig extension, refer the sample file in this gistuuidgen in terminal to generate a new one
| import mmap | |
| import torch | |
| import json | |
| import os | |
| from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download | |
| def load_file(filename, device): | |
| with open(filename, mode="r", encoding="utf8") as file_obj: | |
| with mmap.mmap(file_obj.fileno(), length=0, access=mmap.ACCESS_READ) as m: |
Do I want to die on this hill?
Am I including everyone?
I want Microsoft to do better, want Windows to be a decent development platform-and yet, I constantly see Microsoft playing the open source game: advertising how open-source and developer friendly they are - only to crush developers under the heel of the corporate behemoth's boot.
The people who work at Microsoft are amazing, kind, talented individuals. This is aimed at the company's leadership, who I feel has on many occassions crushed myself and other developers under. It's a plea for help.
You probably haven't heard of it before, but if you've ever used win32 API bindings in C#, C++, Rust, or other languages, odds are they were generated from a repository called microsoft/win32metadata.
This document describes the general outcome we want for users as well as a few ideas on how we should do this. It shouldn't be considered prescriptive or precise though; if we come up with better ideas along the way, we should do them instead!
Users should be able to run something like the following:
$ sbt new typelevel/serverless.g8 --branch aws/http
I'm going to do something that I don't normally do, which is to say I'm going to talk about comparative benchmarks. In general, I try to confine performance discussion to absolute metrics as much as possible, or comparisons to other well-defined neutral reference points. This is precisely why Cats Effect's readme mentions a comparison to a fixed thread pool, rather doing comparisons with other asynchronous runtimes like Akka or ZIO. Comparisons in general devolve very quickly into emotional marketing.
But, just once, today we're going to talk about the emotional marketing. In particular, we're going to look at Cats Effect 3 and ZIO 2. Now, for context, as of this writing ZIO 2 has released their first milestone; they have not released a final 2.0 version. This implies straight off the bat that we're comparing apples to oranges a bit, since Cats Effect 3 has been out and in production for months. However, there has been a post going around which cites various compar
| -- We can re-use metatables where possible | |
| local lookupCache = { | |
| __index = function(self, i) | |
| local v = { __index = i } | |
| self[i] = v | |
| return v | |
| end | |
| } | |
| local function use_aho_corasick(automaton, str) |
A minimal table to compare the Espressif's MCU families. The reported specifications are referred to the SoC, not to the modules (silver shield).
| ESP8266 | ESP32 | ESP32-S2 | ESP32-S3 | ESP32-C3 | ESP32-C6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announcement Date | 2014, August | 2016, September |