ayamflow · August 29, 2015 13:56 · Feb 12, 2014 · Feb 12, 2014 · Feb 8, 2014 · Feb 8, 2014
diff --git a/gistfile1.md b/gistfile1.md
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 * Performance: see this [performance comparison](http://vuejs.org/perf/)
 
 ##Untested stuff
-* ~~Not sure if Vue has an under-the-hood equivalent for [ng-src](http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.directive:ngHref) & [ng-href](http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.directive:ngSrc) (prevent 404 before compilation when binding images & links)~~~ href attribute in img cause a 404 error before compilation
+* ~~Not sure if Vue has an under-the-hood equivalent for [ng-src](http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.directive:ngHref) & [ng-href](http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.directive:ngSrc) (prevent 404 before compilation when binding images & links)~~~ Use the [v-attr directive](http://vuejs.org/api/directives.html#v-attr).
 * Don't know how testable Vue is, while Angular is built with testability (mocks, DI, karma…) in mind. Check the last paragraph on [this documentation page](http://vuejs.org/guide/application.html).
 
 ## Angular

diff --git a/gistfile1.md b/gistfile1.md
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 * Performance: see this [performance comparison](http://vuejs.org/perf/)
 
 ##Untested stuff
-* Not sure if Vue has an under-the-hood equivalent for [ng-src](http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.directive:ngHref) & [ng-href](http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.directive:ngSrc) (prevent 404 before compilation when binding images & links)
+* ~~Not sure if Vue has an under-the-hood equivalent for [ng-src](http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.directive:ngHref) & [ng-href](http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.directive:ngSrc) (prevent 404 before compilation when binding images & links)~~~ href attribute in img cause a 404 error before compilation
 * Don't know how testable Vue is, while Angular is built with testability (mocks, DI, karma…) in mind. Check the last paragraph on [this documentation page](http://vuejs.org/guide/application.html).
 
 ## Angular

diff --git a/gistfile1.md b/gistfile1.md
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
 * [!] Directives are kind of different: 
 	* Angular: DOM manipulation, Events, web components
 	* Vue: DOM manipulation and Events only. Vue.component for the web components
+
+* Performance: see this [performance comparison](http://vuejs.org/perf/)
 
 ##Untested stuff
 * Not sure if Vue has an under-the-hood equivalent for [ng-src](http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.directive:ngHref) & [ng-href](http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.directive:ngSrc) (prevent 404 before compilation when binding images & links)

diff --git a/gistfile1.md b/gistfile1.md
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
 * Full-blown framework: routing, services, DI, promises, $http...
 * Real structure & config (app.run, app.config)
 * $templateCache for building & caching templates
-* Get complex on large-scale with nested/isolated $scope, $apply/$digest cycles
+* [Get complex](https://github.com/angular/angular.js/wiki/Understanding-Scopes) on large-scale with nested/isolated $scope, $apply/$digest cycles
 * ~80ko bare
 * Poor documentation, official tutorial doesn't cover directives and stuff (better with the community growth)
 * Dirty checking for data-binding

diff --git a/gistfile1.md b/gistfile1.md
@@ -24,11 +24,10 @@
 * $templateCache for building & caching templates
 * Get complex on large-scale with nested/isolated $scope, $apply/$digest cycles
 * ~80ko bare
-* Still a great framework overall
-
 * Poor documentation, official tutorial doesn't cover directives and stuff (better with the community growth)
 * Dirty checking for data-binding
 * Feels a bit like 'writing angular' more than 'writing javascript'
+* Still a great framework overall
 
 ## Vue + Component = pick'n'go
 * IE9+

diff --git a/gistfile1.md b/gistfile1.md
@@ -18,17 +18,18 @@
 * Don't know how testable Vue is, while Angular is built with testability (mocks, DI, karma…) in mind. Check the last paragraph on [this documentation page](http://vuejs.org/guide/application.html).
 
 ## Angular
-* IE8* (IE8 support is to be dropped in the future)
-* Horrible documentation, official tutorial doesn't cover directives and stuff
+* IE8+ (IE8 support is to be dropped in the future)
 * Full-blown framework: routing, services, DI, promises, $http...
 * Real structure & config (app.run, app.config)
-* Dirty checking for data-binding
 * $templateCache for building & caching templates
 * Get complex on large-scale with nested/isolated $scope, $apply/$digest cycles
 * ~80ko bare
-* Feels a bit like 'writing angular' more than 'writing javascript'
 * Still a great framework overall
 
+* Poor documentation, official tutorial doesn't cover directives and stuff (better with the community growth)
+* Dirty checking for data-binding
+* Feels a bit like 'writing angular' more than 'writing javascript'
+
 ## Vue + Component = pick'n'go
 * IE9+
 * Well written documentation with examples, and cover all of Vue's features

diff --git a/gistfile1.md b/gistfile1.md
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+#[Angular.js](angularjs.org) / [Vue.js](http://vuejs.org/) similarities & differences
+
+##Similar stuff
+* Same transtion API (enter/leave)
+* Filters
+* Two-way data-binding
+* Nested scope inheritance
+* Modules:
+	* Angular enables to separate an application into [modules](http://docs.angularjs.org/guide/module)
+	* Vue allows to encapsulate assets, check [Encapsulating private assets](http://vuejs.org/guide/composition.html) for more info
+
+* [!] Directives are kind of different: 
+	* Angular: DOM manipulation, Events, web components
+	* Vue: DOM manipulation and Events only. Vue.component for the web components
+
+##Untested stuff
+* Not sure if Vue has an under-the-hood equivalent for [ng-src](http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.directive:ngHref) & [ng-href](http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.directive:ngSrc) (prevent 404 before compilation when binding images & links)
+* Don't know how testable Vue is, while Angular is built with testability (mocks, DI, karma…) in mind. Check the last paragraph on [this documentation page](http://vuejs.org/guide/application.html).
+
+## Angular
+* IE8* (IE8 support is to be dropped in the future)
+* Horrible documentation, official tutorial doesn't cover directives and stuff
+* Full-blown framework: routing, services, DI, promises, $http...
+* Real structure & config (app.run, app.config)
+* Dirty checking for data-binding
+* $templateCache for building & caching templates
+* Get complex on large-scale with nested/isolated $scope, $apply/$digest cycles
+* ~80ko bare
+* Feels a bit like 'writing angular' more than 'writing javascript'
+* Still a great framework overall
+
+## Vue + Component = pick'n'go
+* IE9+
+* Well written documentation with examples, and cover all of Vue's features
+* Add your features: promises, ajax, routing: more flexible but sometime more glue to write (routing for instance)
+* Less declarative templates (only directive are present, no ng-app and stuff)
+* Doesn't enforce a particular structure
+* require('template.html') for building & caching
+* I like the clean, separated scopes: `vm.data` for all models, `vm.methods` for the event listeners & stuff, and lifecycle-related methods directly on the vm, such as `vm.ready`, `vm.destroy`… (check this [example](http://vuejs.org/guide/events.html) for a better understanding)
+* Overall simpler API (Vue, Vue.extend, Vue.component, Vue.directive, Vue.filter)
+* ES5 getters/setters for data-binding
+* Feels simpler because of a simpler API. No confusion between factory/service/provider...
+* ~30ko bare
No results found