Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@alopezari
Created May 6, 2026 14:50
Show Gist options
  • Select an option

  • Save alopezari/a07b06ccb845aff024b806e42198d20f to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Select an option

Save alopezari/a07b06ccb845aff024b806e42198d20f to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Desktop Mode v0.7.1 — Coverage gaps & meta-review (Magellan)

Coverage gaps — desktop-mode 2026-05-06T13-23-40_desktop-mode

Summary

  • 0 hypotheses silently skipped (automated check passed)
  • 0 surfaces from recon/static-analysis unaddressed
  • 0 AND-list items scored on aggregate when per-path was needed
  • 0 round-trip probes missing on critical pairs
  • 0 Questions filed only from source inspection (no empirical attempt)
  • 1 forcing-function string missing (MEDIUM — probe ran, string absent)

Automated pre-check exit 0: no HIGH gaps. Model meta-review not dispatched.


Gaps by check

Check 1: Hypothesis coverage

All 26 static-analysis hypotheses (H1–H26) addressed across 11 sessions. No silent skips.

Check 2: Static-analysis hypothesis coverage

All surface-map risk-tagged rows carried forward into numbered hypotheses or explicitly deprioritized. No silent dropouts.

Check 3: Recon-flagged surface coverage

All 8 recon surprises (S1–S8) anchored in at least one charter. All probed.

Check 4: AND-list aggregate vs per-handler

Recycle Bin REST layer has two write paths (/recycle-bin GET + /recycle-bin/empty POST); both addressed in recycle-bin-andlist and scale-presence-cluster. No aggregate-only scoring.

Check 5: Round-trip / compositional probes

OS Settings save → reload round-trip: probed in os-settings-save (wallpaper + accent persisted). Recycle Bin trash → restore round-trip: probed in breadth-tour-recycle. Portal entry flow: probed in portal-session-cluster. No gaps.

Check 6: Empirical-probe-is-mandatory

All Questions arose from probes that were architecturally or budget-blocked with explicit rationale. No source-only-Question drift.

Check 7: Custom-widget classification

Desktop shell uses custom JS-driven widgets (dock, window chrome, virtual desktops). All major widgets were reached via Actionbook; accessibility tree gaps noted in Questions but not a classification miss.

Check 8: Must-cover flows

All 9 must-cover flows from mission.md addressed by at least one session. breadth-tour-admin provisioning failure left minor gaps in the admin surface, but 10 other sessions collectively cover those flows.

Check 9: Feature anchor completeness

Scale-sensitive probes: presence.php (H9) and recycle-bin per_page (H22) both hit the c2 source-pattern fallback and filed major Problems. Anchor quota met.

Check 10: Coverage-note forcing-function strings

Session Issue
recycle-bin-andlist Missing "default blast radius probed:" in coverage_notes (MEDIUM — empty-bin scale probe did run; string only absent from coverage_notes)

All other required forcing-function strings present across sessions.

Check 11: External-resource-failure probes

Plugin loads no external CDN assets, fonts, or APIs in admin context (confirmed by static analysis: all JS/CSS enqueued from local plugin directory). No external-resource failure probes required.

Check 12: Content-authoring UX probes

Plugin ships no starter content, demo importers, or sample data. Not applicable.

Check 13: Route-content-depth

Session reports include content-level assertions (e.g., breadth-tour-recycle verified item title + restore status, not just "200 OK"). No status-only pass claims found.


Recommendation

No blocking gaps. The pilot can be declared complete.

  • The single MEDIUM gap (Check 10 forcing-function string) is acceptable: the underlying probe ran and produced a filed major Problem (P6 / empty-bin truncation). The missing string is a metadata omission, not a coverage miss.
  • breadth-tour-admin provisioning failure left virtual-desktop switching (H17) and admin-bar toggle behavior (H19) partially unprobed. Both are captured as Questions in the final report and do not constitute high-severity coverage gaps.

1 high-severity gap, 1 low-severity gap.

Wait — automated check returned 0 HIGH. Correcting:

0 high-severity gaps, 1 medium-severity gap.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment