Tesla Key Card Protocol ======================= > Researched by Robert Quattlebaum . > > Last updated 2020-02-03.

Image of Tesla Key Card Image of Tesla Model 3 Key Fob

> **IMPORTANT NOTE:** *The information in this document does NOT > enable anyone to clone official Tesla Key Cards or otherwise > unlock or start a vehicle that they didn't already have the > ability to unlock or start.* This document describes the current understanding of the Tesla Key Card Protocol, as used on the *Tesla Model 3*. This protocol was determined from observing the pairing and authentication interactions between the Tesla Key Card (TKC) and the vehicle, as well as probing the TKC with various commands to see what would happen. The basic working subset of commands necessary to pair and authenticate are well understood and documented here. There are several other commands that we know are present, but they are not yet well understood. The NFC protocol for the [Tesla Model 3 Key Fob][] (TM3KF) and Tesla smartphone app (TPK) is also covered. In general, any reference to a TKC also applies to the TM3KF and TPK unless an explicit exception is noted. [Tesla Model 3 Key Fob]: https://shop.tesla.com/product/model-3-key-fob The information presented here was used to implement [GaussKeyCard][], an open-source Java Card applet that allows you to use a [supported](https://github.com/darconeous/gauss-key-card/wiki/Recommended-Cards) Java Card to unlock and start vehicles in the same way that you would with an official Tesla Key Card. [GaussKeyCard]: https://github.com/darconeous/gauss-key-card ## Terminology ATS: Answer To Select. This is a short string of bytes that describe to the reader how to communicate with the card. AID: [Application Identifier](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMV#Application_selection) APDU: [Application Protocol Data Unit](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_card_application_protocol_data_unit), name for commands sent to a smart card. CA: [Certificate Authority](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certificate_authority) ECDH: [Elliptic-curve Diffie–Hellman](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic-curve_Diffie–Hellman), a key-agreement protocol. FSCI: The part of the ATS that describes the maximum supported frame size. Tesla vehicles require an FSCI value of at least 6 (96 bytes). TPK: Tesla Phone Key (NFC, only available on Android) TKC: Tesla Key Card TM3KF: [Tesla Model 3 Key Fob][] Token: A secure device used for authentication that is resistant to cloning. UID: Unique Identifier ## Background ## When it comes to access control, there are two related but distinct concepts: identification and authentication. *Identification* simply means knowing who/what you are interacting with. With NFC, the 7-byte unique identifier is often used for identification purposes since it is defined to be unique. Sometimes even the older 4-byte UID is used for this purpose. But this identifier is easily spoofed with easy-to-obtain and inexpensive hardware. The UID alone offers no cryptographic assurances that it the authentic, original token. *Authentication* is an additional step where you cryptographically verify the identity of the token in a way that only the original token could satisfy. ## General Description ## TKCs use 256-bit Elliptic-Curve Cryptography to authenticate to the vehicle. The specific elliptic curve being used is the NIST P-256 curve, otherwise known as `secp256r1`. The specific algorithm being used to authenticate the card is a simple challenge-response using a shared key derived using Elliptic-curve Diffie–Hellman (ECDH). When pairing a TKC to a car, the vehicle asks the card for its public key and then performs a test authentication. While the TKC protocol does support an attestation certificate, it does not appear to currently be used. Note that the TPK does NOT have an attestation certificate. Each Tesla Key Card has a NFC UID, *which in recent vehicle firmware versions is ignored*. ~~Testing has confirmed that two TKCs with the same ECDH key but different NFC UIDs will appear to the vehicle as two separate cards. However, testing has also confirmed that two cards with different ECDH keys but the same UID will *also* appear as two separate cards. Thus, it would appear that the vehicle identifies each card by both its UID *and* ECDH key.~~ ~~Note that the vehicle does not fetch the ECDH public key from the card when authenticating, so it must be comparing the response from the TKC against the expected response from all paired TKCs with the same UID. This is pretty strange, but there isn't a lot of room for alternative explanations given the observed behavior.~~ > **UPDATE**: Recent versions of the vehicle firmware now fetch the > public key from the card before sending the challenge, and seem to > use ONLY this information for identifying a credential. This means > that it is now MUCH easier to make cloned card *pairs*. > Note that cloning an existing card remains mostly impossible, but > prior to this change it was very difficult for your average hacker > to make two new key cards that would work as clones (becuase it is > generally difficult to arbitrarilly change the UID of a javacard). > That is now no longer the case. ## Important: IEEE 14443 Type-A Only The vehicle will apparently refuse to read 14443 Type-B cards. Only Type-A cards are compatible. ## Important: Max Frame Size The vehicle will ignore the FSCI field of the ATS, which means that it will not attempt to break up larger frames if the indicated FSCI is small (<6). Specifically, **the card MUST be able to properly handle receiving the authenticate command (86 bytes) in a single frame**. If a card advertises an FSCI smaller than 6 then it is unlikely to be able to satisfy this requirement. For example, smart cards with DESFire EV1 emulation support have an FSCI of 5, and will unfortunately choke if they receive a frame larger than 64 bytes. Such cards are not able to be used as Tesla Key Cards. > NOTE: In earlier versions of this document, this behavior was confused with > the NFC UID length. It just happened to be the case that most of the > 4-byte UID cards the author tested also had an FCI of 5. There is no > limitation of the length of the UID on the card imposed by the vehicle. ## Other potentially relevant details The Tesla Key Card, as currently sold by Tesla, has the following potentially relevant properties: * IEEE 14443 Type A * UID: 7 bytes (except TPK, which may be `01020304` or a randomly selected UID starting with the value `08`) * ATQA: 0x4800 * SAK: 0x20 * ATS: `057877910200` * FSCI: 8 (256 bytes) The secure element itself is a chip made by NXP (P60) running a Java Card OS of some sort. It is *NOT* a DESFire chip, it is a real secure element. The vehicle will go through the authentication steps for TKCs it hasn't been paired with. ## Application Identifier (AID) The primary interface that the vehicle uses to pair and authenticate TKCs is the AID `7465736c614c6f676963`, or `teslaLogic`. This is the default selected application on official TKCs. Note that, strictly speaking, this isn't a valid ISO 7816-5 AID, since it is not [registered](https://www.ansi.org/other_services/registration_programs/rid) and it doesn't start with the nibble `0xf` to indicate that it is a proprietary and unregistered AID. This is likely why the vehicle actually tries to use `f465736c614c6f676963` first, which is the AID for the TPK. In any case, the use of the AID `7465736c614c6f676963` is sufficiently unique that it is unlikely to cause problems in practice. The TPK AID `f465736c614c6f676963` appears to be treated the same way as its non-7816-5-compilant cousin. The full `teslaLogic` AID on official TKCs is `7465736C614C6F67696330303201`, or `teslaLogic002` followed by the byte `0x01`. `002` is assumed to be the version. On the TM3KF, the full AID is `teslaLogic005` with no trailing bytes. No FCI is returned when the application is selected on an official TKC or TM3KF. In some cases having an FCI present causes the car to reject the card. In other cases it seems to accept the card. Additional research is needed to figure out more details. There is also a `teslaStore` applet (`teslaStore002` for TKC, `teslaStore003` for TM3KF). However, it does not appear to be selectable. ## Quick-Reference APDUs * Select `teslaLogic` AID * Cards/Fobs: `00a404000a 7465736c614c6f676963` * Alternate: `00a404000a f465736c614c6f676963` * Get Public ECDH Key (secp256r1) * `8004000000` * Authentication Challenge (ECDH) * `8011000051 [VEHICLE-PUBLIC-KEY] [16B-CHALLENGE]` * Get Form Factor * `80140000` * Get Version Info * `80170000` * Self Test? * `80010000` ## Important Commands The following proprietary (CLA=0x80) APDU instructions are used by the vehicle during authentication or pairing, or were discovered by probing: ### INS 0x04: Get Public Key Field | Value | Notes ------|-------|--------------- CLA | 0x80 | INS | 0x04 | P1 | 0x00-0x03 | Key Identifier P2 | 0x00 | Lc | — | Data | — | Le | 0x00 | This command returns a public key for one of the keys in the TKC/TM3KF. **The TPK currently only supports KeyID 0.** The `KeyID` is a number between 0 and 3. Only 0x00 appears to be currently used by the vehicle. No other arguments are currently known. The observed format of the response (not including success code `9000`) is: byte 1| bytes 2-33 | bytes 34-65 ------|------------|-------------- 0x04 | EC Point X | EC Point Y ### INS 0x06: Get Certificate Field | Value | Notes ------|-------|--------------- CLA | 0x80 | INS | 0x06 | P1 | 0x00-0x04 | Certificate Identifier P2 | 0x00 | Lc | — | Data | — | Le | 0x000000 | Extended-lenth response This command returns one of (up to) five X.509 certificates, one for each `KeyID` and one "root". **This command is not currently supported on the TPK.** This command is not currently used by the vehicle during pairing or authentication. On the Tesla Key Card, only two certificates are available via this command: 0x00 and 0x04. All five certificates are available on the Tesla Model 3 Key Fob. You can see examples of the [certificates section](#certificates) at the end of this document. Each certificate is larger than 256 bytes, so support for extended APDUs is required to get the entire certificate. Because support for chaining does not appear to be implemented and not all readers support extended APDUs, the full certificate may be impossible to extract on hardware that doesn't support extended APDUs. The `CertID` is a value between 0 and 4. Values 0-3 presumably refer to `KeyID`s 0-3. Typically only KeyID 0 has a certificate. CertID | TKC (`teslaLogic002`) | TM3KF (`teslaLogic005`) ------:|-----------------------|------------ 0x00 | KeyID 0 Cert | KeyID 0 Cert 0x01 | *Err 6F17* | KeyID 1 Cert 0x02 | *Err 6F17* | KeyID 2 Cert 0x03 | *Err 6F17* | Fob Issuing CA 0x04 | root.tesla.com CA | Fob Command CA ≥ 0x05 | *Err 6B00* | *Err* On the TKC, `CertID` 4 is some sort of root certificate, but doesn't appear to be the certificate that signed `KeyID` 0. You can see it and an example of a non-root certificate at the end of this document. On the TKC, The first two bytes of the returned result represent the length of the certificate in bytes. There is no leading length word for the certificates on the TM3KF. ### INS 0x07: Get Versions Field | Value | Notes ------|-------|--------------- CLA | 0x80 | INS | 0x07 | P1 | 0x00 | P2 | 0x00 | Lc | — | Data | — | Le | 0x00 | Appears to return the version numbers for the `teslaLogic` and `teslaStore`, along with an additional version to an unknown component. **This command is not currently supported on the TPK.** The versions are encoded as three 16-bit big-endian numbers. The first corresponds with `teslaLogic` and the second corresponds with `teslaStore`. It is unclear what the third corresponds with. Order | TKC | TM3KF ------|-----|------------------ 1st | 0x0002 | 0x0005 2nd | 0x0002 | 0x0003 3nd | 0x0002 | 0x0003 ### INS 0x11: Authentication Challenge Field | Value | Notes ------|-------|--------------- CLA | 0x80 | INS | 0x11 | P1 | 0x00-0x03 | Key Identifier P2 | 0x00 | Lc | 0x51 | 71 bytes in data field Data | 0x04 ... | 65-byte NIST P.256 Vehicle Public Key  | ... | 16-byte Challenge Le | 0x00 | This is the command the vehicle uses to authenticate the TKC. The returned value is a 16-byte response. The response is calculated as follows: 1. Calculate the ECDH shared secret. 2. Calculate the SHA-1 hash of the X parameter of the shared secret. 3. Truncate the SHA-1 hash to the most significant 128 bits. 4. Perform a single AES-128 block operation using the challenge as the plaintext and the value from the previous step as the key. The resulting cyphertext is the response. On the TM3KF (`teslaLogic005`) and TPK, the first four bytes of the challenge plaintext are replaced with random data generated on the fob. The vehicle then needs to decrypt the returned response to verify that the remaining 12 bytes match the challenge. The KeyID is a number between 0 and 3. Only 0x00 appears to be currently used by the vehicle. It is assumed that this field corresponds to the KeyID parameter from INS 0x04. ### INS 0x14: Get Form Factor Field | Value | Notes ------|-------|--------------- CLA | 0x80 | INS | 0x14 | P1 | 0x00 | P2 | 0x00 | Lc | — | Data | — | Le | 0x00 | This command returns a two-byte form factor identifier. This command is always used by the vehicle after the authentication challenge response. The value doesn't appear to currently change the behavior of the vehicle UI. Description | Return Value ---------------------|--------------------- Tesla Key Card (TKC) | `0x0001` Tesla Key Fob (TM3KF)| `0x0022` Tesla Phone Key (TPK)| `0x0031` ### INS 0x1B: Set Vehicle Info Field | Value | Notes ------|-------|--------------- CLA | 0x80 | INS | 0x1B | P1 | 0x00 | P2 | 0x00 | Lc | 0x15 | 4 byte header + 17 byte VIN Data | 0x2a130a11 | ASN.1 Header  | ... | 17-digit VIN (ASCII) Le | — | No response data expected This command is issued to the TPK after the normal pairing exchange. It is only issued at pairing. The exact purpose of this command is unknown, but the data sent from the vehicle is TLV-encoded (ASN.1?) and includes the 17-digit VIN: ``` 2a130a11 + [2a] { [0a] } ``` It seems that the TPK does not actually parse this data as ASN.1: it simply ignores the first 3 bytes and assumes the fourth byte is the VIN length and that the VIN starts at byte 5. That behavior may change, though. ## Other Unknown Commands Through probing, we know the `teslaLogic` AID also supports the following APDU instructions, but we don't yet know what they do: * INS 0x00 -> Error 0x6f05 * INS 0x01 -> Success? 0x9000 (Takes a long time to complete, possibly a self-test) * INS 0x02 -> Error 0x6f12 * INS 0x03 -> Error 0x6f12 * INS 0x05 -> Error 0x6f16 * INS 0x08 -> Success? 0x9000 * INS 0x12 -> Success? 0x9000 * INS 0x13 -> Error 0x6f1b * INS 0x15 -> Error 0x6f1d * INS 0xA4 -> Success? 0x9000 (Tesla Phone Key Only) None of the above commands (except INS 0xA4) are implemented on the TPK. ## Authentication Process for TKC 1. Vehicle attempts to select AID `f465736c614c6f676963` * TKC indicates no such AID. 2. Vehicle attempts to select AID `7465736c614c6f676963`, which succeeds. * TKC indicates success 3. ***NEW:*** Vehicle requests the public key of the TKC using INS 4 APDU. * TKC responds with its public key. 4. Vehicle sends INS 0x11 APDU with vehicle public key and a random challenge. * TKC verifies public key is on curve P-256 * TKC calculates and returns the response to the challenge 5. Vehicle sends INS 0x14 APDU. * TKC responds with the value 0x0001 and a successful response code. 6. Vehicle repeatedly sends junk APDUs to determine when TKC is removed. ## Pairing Process 1. Steps 1-5 of the authentication process are performed, presumably to ensure the presented card isn't one that is already known. 2. Vehicle sends INS 0x11 APDU with vehicle public key and challenge of all zeros. * TKC verifies public key is on curve P-256 * TKC calculates and returns the response to the challenge 3. Vehicle repeatedly sends junk APDUs to determine when TKC is removed. ## Tesla Model 3 Key Fob Differences The Tesla Key Fob also has an NFC interface. It kinda seems to implement the same protocol, but there are some differenes: * Three of the four ECDH keys has a certificate. The CN of each of these certificates has a suffix indcating which KeyID they are associated with: `- 0`/`- 1`/`- 2`. * CertID3 seems to contain an intermediate CA: "Fob Issuing CA". It is independent of KeyID3, which seems to not have an associated certificate. The "Fob Issuing CA" is the issuing CA for CertID0, CertID1, and CertID2. * CertID4 has a different intermediate CA: "Fob Command CA". It is unclear what this certificate is for. * Both CertID3 and CertID4 are signed by a "Fob Root CA", which does not appear to be availble. * The certificates don't appear to be prefixed with a length, so heuristics will be required to read certificates in an automated way. * INS 0x07 returns `0005 0003 0003` instead of `0002 0002 0002` like on the TKC. This makes it seem likely that this command returns version information (TM3KF:`teslaLogic005/teslaStore003` vs TKC:`teslaLogic002/teslaStore002`). * INS 0x14 (Get Form Factor) returns `0022` instead of `0001`. * INS 0x11 (Authenticate) doesn't seem to work the same way: the 16-byte response is different each time. The documentation for INS 0x11 has been updated to reflect the changes. * The `80ca2f00` trick yields the following AIDs: * `A000000151000000` -> Global Platform ISD * `5465736C61444150` -> `TeslaDAP` * `7465736C6153746F7265303033` -> `teslaStore003` * `7465736C614C6F676963303035` -> `teslaLogic005` The pairing process, despite the additional BTLE pairing, is exactly the same. ## Tesla Phone Key Differences The latest version of the Tesla App on Android provides a NFC key interface (Tesla Phone Key, or TPK), allowing you to use the phone just like a TKC. Pairing works the exact same way. The protocol implemented by the TPK is a limited subset of what is available on a TKC or TM3KF. Here are the differences: * Has only one ECDH key instead of four like the TKC and TM3KF. * There are no certificates. * The command INS 0x14 returns `0x0031` instead of `0x0001` or `0x0022`. * It includes random card-generated salt, just like the TM3KF. * It includes a new command, INS 0x1B, which the vehicle uses to tell the phone its VIN. This command seems to only be sent to the TPK and not the TKC or TM3KF, so it may be introspecting into the UID to gate the issuing of this command. * You must be logged into a Tesla account on the phone in order to use the NFC TPK functionality, so you can't use this feature to give someone access to your car unless they have a Tesla account. It is unclear what happens if you try to pair a phone with a vehicle on a different account. Command INS 0x1B implies that the phone might take notice and behave differently. * If you explicltly sign out of the app and then sign back in, the public key is preserved—so NFC key access to any vehicles that was lost when you signed out should be restored when you sign back in. It is unclear if this is true if you sign in with a different account, but seems likely. In other words, *signing out doesn't wipe the NFC credential*. * The vehicle was able to determine the name of the phone for its internal UI after pairing. This seems to imply either an in-band interaction that I missed or an out-of-band (BLE?) interaction. The vehicle seems to remember this sort of metadata even for deleted cards. ## Certificates Tesla Key Cards/Fobs have X.509 certificates which can be retrieved via INS 0x06. Below are real examples of the certificates that were extracted from a TKC and a TM3KF: ### Card Certificate ``` Certificate: Data: Version: 3 (0x2) Serial Number: 72515 (0x11b43) Signature Algorithm: ecdsa-with-SHA256 Issuer: CN=Key Card CA, O=Selp Validity Not Before: Oct 11 16:48:35 2017 GMT Not After : Oct 11 16:48:35 2117 GMT Subject: CN=7179009621072316, OU=KEY CARD, O=Selp Subject Public Key Info: Public Key Algorithm: id-ecPublicKey Public-Key: (256 bit) pub: 04:68:0e:ad:81:7c:38:77:b7:ec:be:1e:0b:52:fb: 8c:93:17:92:37:7e:e9:57:57:c4:f8:6a:e7:55:ae: cb:d6:28:66:9a:4a:2a:ac:97:7e:e2:29:e8:62:c3: a3:c5:1b:3f:ec:18:90:3f:7b:e0:47:00:be:0c:e0: 6d:ae:aa:08:e4 ASN1 OID: prime256v1 NIST CURVE: P-256 X509v3 extensions: X509v3 Basic Constraints: critical CA:FALSE X509v3 Key Usage: critical Digital Signature, Non Repudiation, Key Encipherment X509v3 Subject Key Identifier: 05:FE:FD:EB:27:A6:2C:C3:70:C4:08:9C:5F:31:1F:B1:43:D7:4D:55 X509v3 Authority Key Identifier: keyid:30:A1:05:FA:1D:23:E2:80:F3:73:4F:7A:E6:E1:7C:37:5D:01:F9:B2 X509v3 Extended Key Usage: TLS Web Client Authentication Signature Algorithm: ecdsa-with-SHA256 30:45:02:20:15:74:40:b6:d4:05:92:d1:53:33:96:d4:cd:5e: 97:a4:0f:00:4c:52:8e:a0:93:3a:a3:ed:50:fd:88:9f:8e:38: 02:21:00:dd:87:44:45:94:36:53:fe:b9:ae:84:aa:eb:94:22: 70:d9:a6:97:fc:69:53:91:86:9e:4f:3a:6e:8f:61:1f:21 -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- MIIByjCCAXCgAwIBAgIDARtDMAoGCCqGSM49BAMCMCUxFDASBgNVBAMMC0tleSBD YXJkIENBMQ0wCwYDVQQKDARTZWxwMCAXDTE3MTAxMTE2NDgzNVoYDzIxMTcxMDEx MTY0ODM1WjA9MRkwFwYDVQQDDBA3MTc5MDA5NjIxMDcyMzE2MREwDwYDVQQLDAhL RVkgQ0FSRDENMAsGA1UECgwEU2VscDBZMBMGByqGSM49AgEGCCqGSM49AwEHA0IA BGgOrYF8OHe37L4eC1L7jJMXkjd+6VdXxPhq51Wuy9YoZppKKqyXfuIp6GLDo8Ub P+wYkD974EcAvgzgba6qCOSjdTBzMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQD AgXgMB0GA1UdDgQWBBQF/v3rJ6Ysw3DECJxfMR+xQ9dNVTAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBQw oQX6HSPigPNzT3rm4Xw3XQH5sjATBgNVHSUEDDAKBggrBgEFBQcDAjAKBggqhkjO PQQDAgNIADBFAiAVdEC21AWS0VMzltTNXpekDwBMUo6gkzqj7VD9iJ+OOAIhAN2H REWUNlP+ua6EquuUInDZppf8aVORhp5POm6PYR8h -----END CERTIFICATE----- ``` Observations: * Certificate serial number appears sequential. The other card in the same two-card pack had a certificate serial number of 72513. * Tesla is not mentioned anywhere in the subject or issuer. Instead, the organization is listed as "Selp"; which likely referrs to the French smart-card/identity solution company [Selp](https://www.selp.fr/en/private-identity/). * The CN of the subject is a 16-digit decimal number. Unlike the certificate serial number, this number appears to be randomly assigned. * The certificate expires a hundred years after its issue date, which isn't necessarilly bad, but [there is a way to indicate that a certificate should not have an enforcable expiration date](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-4.1.2.5), and using an expiration date of "today + 100years" isn't it. But really I'm just splitting hairs here. * The key usage parameters are quite broad. It isn't clear how the current implementation of a TKC could actually perform any of them. I assume these fields are simply a misconfiguration. * The CA that signed this certificate (Issuer `CN=Key Card CA, O=Selp`) is not the root certificate that is present on the card (see below). Because we don't have a copy of the the `CN=Key Card CA, O=Selp` certificate, we have no way to determine if the certificate is actually valid, which seems unfortunate. ### Card Root Certificate ``` Certificate: Data: Version: 3 (0x2) Serial Number: 2 (0x2) Signature Algorithm: ecdsa-with-SHA256 Issuer: CN=root.tesla.com Validity Not Before: Jan 9 15:37:10 2017 GMT Not After : Jan 9 15:37:10 2018 GMT Subject: CN=root.tesla.com Subject Public Key Info: Public Key Algorithm: id-ecPublicKey Public-Key: (256 bit) pub: 04:ba:05:a4:c5:58:5d:5f:f8:52:0f:1c:3b:c8:b3: 02:48:04:56:7c:b0:d2:fe:a3:0d:23:62:51:5e:6a: ad:51:86:3c:3c:b6:24:49:3e:c6:f6:b9:e2:00:43: 11:83:eb:bd:64:bb:95:f3:82:f5:14:b7:ff:3b:d7: e5:20:5c:7f:60 ASN1 OID: prime256v1 NIST CURVE: P-256 X509v3 extensions: X509v3 Basic Constraints: CA:TRUE Signature Algorithm: ecdsa-with-SHA256 30:46:02:21:00:9c:b1:0d:dd:a8:30:b8:7e:ca:aa:d1:39:e3: 98:76:6c:6e:23:44:78:23:35:be:bb:76:d8:26:7b:d8:1a:05: 26:02:21:00:8d:6e:00:05:fc:4e:46:3b:80:43:9c:fb:f5:c2: 18:3c:58:ce:e3:86:7d:89:69:a7:71:62:4b:5a:99:cb:1f:53 -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- MIIBMTCB16ADAgECAgECMAoGCCqGSM49BAMCMBkxFzAVBgNVBAMTDnJvb3QudGVz bGEuY29tMB4XDTE3MDEwOTE1MzcxMFoXDTE4MDEwOTE1MzcxMFowGTEXMBUGA1UE AxMOcm9vdC50ZXNsYS5jb20wWTATBgcqhkjOPQIBBggqhkjOPQMBBwNCAAS6BaTF WF1f+FIPHDvIswJIBFZ8sNL+ow0jYlFeaq1Rhjw8tiRJPsb2ueIAQxGD671ku5Xz gvUUt/871+UgXH9goxAwDjAMBgNVHRMEBTADAQH/MAoGCCqGSM49BAMCA0kAMEYC IQCcsQ3dqDC4fsqq0TnjmHZsbiNEeCM1vrt22CZ72BoFJgIhAI1uAAX8TkY7gEOc +/XCGDxYzuOGfYlpp3FiS1qZyx9T -----END CERTIFICATE----- ``` Observations: * This is not the root certificate that signed the card certificate. * This certificate has expired. * Missing "X509v3 Subject Key Identifier" field, which seems unfortunate. * Feels bogus, like this was a test certificate that someone forgot to replace with the real root certificate. Not sure what the story is here. Maybe this is the legit root, and `CN=Key Card CA, O=Selp` is just an intermediate CA? ### Fob Certificate ``` Certificate: Data: Version: 1 (0x0) Serial Number: 81646 (0x13eee) Signature Algorithm: ecdsa-with-SHA256 Issuer: C=US, O=Tesla, CN=Fob Issuing CA 001 Validity Not Before: Sep 28 02:59:05 2019 GMT Not After : Sep 25 02:59:05 2029 GMT Subject: C=US, ST=California, O=Tesla, OU=Model3 Fobs, CN=JBL19268KBH53F - 0 Subject Public Key Info: Public Key Algorithm: id-ecPublicKey Public-Key: (256 bit) pub: 04:01:6d:fd:d2:de:7f:1f:96:91:f6:15:19:16:62: 1b:be:98:a2:a7:40:66:fc:71:91:9d:99:68:b6:03: 51:a5:68:ba:5f:13:9e:30:3d:e3:ff:bb:c4:10:1e: dd:9d:bf:3a:47:cd:33:fc:47:1f:04:6b:ac:20:db: f1:3e:54:11:58 ASN1 OID: prime256v1 NIST CURVE: P-256 Signature Algorithm: ecdsa-with-SHA256 30:45:02:21:00:97:f7:ea:b4:6d:9d:f4:09:1d:35:b1:25:32: 6d:53:0b:8b:c4:07:c9:7c:b4:23:7e:52:ff:db:0b:e3:dd:06: 5c:02:20:4b:bc:6f:ac:20:12:12:19:59:66:c6:dc:a8:3b:ad: f7:1a:02:ec:db:74:e1:b1:e4:6c:47:9f:be:a7:15:bb:41 -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- MIIBiTCCAS8CAwE+7jAKBggqhkjOPQQDAjA6MQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEOMAwGA1UE CgwFVGVzbGExGzAZBgNVBAMMEkZvYiBJc3N1aW5nIENBIDAwMTAeFw0xOTA5Mjgw MjU5MDVaFw0yOTA5MjUwMjU5MDVaMGUxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMRMwEQYDVQQIDApD YWxpZm9ybmlhMQ4wDAYDVQQKDAVUZXNsYTEUMBIGA1UECwwLTW9kZWwzIEZvYnMx GzAZBgNVBAMMEkpCTDE5MjY4S0JINTNGIC0gMDBZMBMGByqGSM49AgEGCCqGSM49 AwEHA0IABAFt/dLefx+WkfYVGRZiG76YoqdAZvxxkZ2ZaLYDUaVoul8TnjA94/+7 xBAe3Z2/OkfNM/xHHwRrrCDb8T5UEVgwCgYIKoZIzj0EAwIDSAAwRQIhAJf36rRt nfQJHTWxJTJtUwuLxAfJfLQjflL/2wvj3QZcAiBLvG+sIBISGVlmxtyoO633GgLs 23ThseRsR5++pxW7QQ== -----END CERTIFICATE----- ``` Observations: * Subject and issuer clearly indicate Tesla, not Selp. * Subject and issuer have fields reversed compared to card certificates. * Missing both "Subject Key Identifier" and "Authority Key Idenifier". * Fob is clearly indicated as being intended for Model 3. * Expiration date is only 10 years in the future. ## Fob Issuing CA ``` Certificate: Data: Version: 3 (0x2) Serial Number: 4096 (0x1000) Signature Algorithm: ecdsa-with-SHA256 Issuer: C=US, ST=California, O=Tesla, OU=Tesla Motors, CN=Fob Root CA Validity Not Before: Jul 13 01:26:07 2018 GMT Not After : Jan 24 01:26:07 2039 GMT Subject: C=US, O=Tesla, CN=Fob Issuing CA 001 Subject Public Key Info: Public Key Algorithm: id-ecPublicKey Public-Key: (256 bit) pub: 04:26:ed:2b:8c:57:89:71:03:58:94:fe:6a:70:84: 99:a5:e6:29:47:a3:8e:7b:e2:8b:18:d3:63:27:9e: 39:6f:d6:3a:f5:b1:b3:42:af:df:97:07:42:99:29: 3c:8a:39:8a:8e:14:f1:44:79:91:74:8e:95:ad:20: 71:67:07:59:f7 ASN1 OID: prime256v1 NIST CURVE: P-256 X509v3 extensions: X509v3 Subject Key Identifier: 8B:BC:81:95:D0:5F:9F:5C:EF:C0:61:ED:A1:DB:A1:49:86:0B:E6:72 X509v3 Authority Key Identifier: keyid:FB:27:C7:61:4A:3B:19:CC:47:EE:D4:95:80:99:28:8A:2E:E8:58:8E X509v3 Basic Constraints: critical CA:TRUE, pathlen:0 X509v3 Key Usage: critical Digital Signature, Certificate Sign, CRL Sign Signature Algorithm: ecdsa-with-SHA256 30:81:87:02:42:01:ee:21:17:06:81:25:b8:20:e5:3f:4e:4b: a7:29:be:54:d1:c8:6e:aa:75:1a:7d:18:67:f5:9a:6b:ef:9d: db:73:2f:00:d5:da:a2:93:6b:fb:1d:ae:c0:d5:1a:5c:11:5f: ef:ac:4d:40:85:a4:35:65:47:ce:8e:72:8b:f3:29:90:ab:02: 41:6d:79:cc:21:27:6a:8c:4c:18:ed:b0:ae:71:6b:eb:60:ce: 5e:1e:4b:85:25:72:e4:1f:de:65:83:bf:38:de:62:72:9b:1d: e7:5f:94:da:da:ec:20:34:e2:b1:f2:09:cc:14:ba:aa:0b:ca: ae:7e:7d:b8:d3:0d:11:03:e8:6c:7e:00 -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- MIICMzCCAZWgAwIBAgICEAAwCgYIKoZIzj0EAwIwXzELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxEzAR BgNVBAgMCkNhbGlmb3JuaWExDjAMBgNVBAoMBVRlc2xhMRUwEwYDVQQLDAxUZXNs YSBNb3RvcnMxFDASBgNVBAMMC0ZvYiBSb290IENBMB4XDTE4MDcxMzAxMjYwN1oX DTM5MDEyNDAxMjYwN1owOjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxDjAMBgNVBAoMBVRlc2xhMRsw GQYDVQQDDBJGb2IgSXNzdWluZyBDQSAwMDEwWTATBgcqhkjOPQIBBggqhkjOPQMB BwNCAAQm7SuMV4lxA1iU/mpwhJml5ilHo4574osY02Mnnjlv1jr1sbNCr9+XB0KZ KTyKOYqOFPFEeZF0jpWtIHFnB1n3o2YwZDAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUi7yBldBfn1zvwGHt oduhSYYL5nIwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAU+yfHYUo7GcxH7tSVgJkoii7oWI4wEgYDVR0T AQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCAYYwCgYIKoZIzj0EAwIDgYsAMIGH AkIB7iEXBoEluCDlP05Lpym+VNHIbqp1Gn0YZ/Waa++d23MvANXaopNr+x2uwNUa XBFf76xNQIWkNWVHzo5yi/MpkKsCQW15zCEnaoxMGO2wrnFr62DOXh5LhSVy5B/e ZYO/ON5icpsd51+U2trsIDTisfIJzBS6qgvKrn59uNMNEQPobH4A -----END CERTIFICATE----- ``` ## Fob Command CA ``` Certificate: Data: Version: 3 (0x2) Serial Number: 4098 (0x1002) Signature Algorithm: ecdsa-with-SHA256 Issuer: C=US, ST=California, O=Tesla, OU=Tesla Motors, CN=Fob Root CA Validity Not Before: Sep 22 00:06:06 2018 GMT Not After : Apr 5 00:06:06 2039 GMT Subject: C=US, O=Tesla, CN=Fob Command CA Subject Public Key Info: Public Key Algorithm: id-ecPublicKey Public-Key: (521 bit) pub: 04:01:50:79:90:b9:2a:10:00:1b:c9:07:bd:f2:3c: 05:a2:47:d5:2c:ea:e7:3e:d4:ec:20:54:18:90:fd: 04:af:71:21:21:40:5b:0c:8e:46:19:3c:9b:63:89: 9e:25:25:39:fb:b6:65:8f:a3:3a:d8:75:f5:d8:10: d3:17:04:ef:05:74:ce:01:f8:9a:8d:9e:c1:57:17: b3:15:be:4d:ca:61:a6:15:49:71:8e:9a:67:2d:98: 03:f1:5e:ea:d3:b6:0a:3d:d2:c3:1a:4d:c8:41:b6: 3f:95:e5:61:93:ba:38:e4:99:3d:9b:7a:4f:d5:63: 2b:4c:e9:0b:3c:cd:f9:ec:ce:5b:7f:ca:e9 ASN1 OID: secp521r1 NIST CURVE: P-521 X509v3 extensions: X509v3 Subject Key Identifier: 38:2C:EC:B4:E6:2C:B8:F6:6E:74:35:56:75:55:05:A0:B4:2E:92:F2 X509v3 Authority Key Identifier: keyid:FB:27:C7:61:4A:3B:19:CC:47:EE:D4:95:80:99:28:8A:2E:E8:58:8E X509v3 Basic Constraints: critical CA:TRUE, pathlen:0 X509v3 Key Usage: critical Digital Signature, Certificate Sign, CRL Sign Signature Algorithm: ecdsa-with-SHA256 30:81:88:02:42:01:fb:04:7c:ae:bd:f7:ea:0b:ee:d0:7b:45: 54:ab:f6:d7:9e:89:21:32:cf:7a:d5:f5:57:4f:b7:aa:91:b6: f7:04:e6:99:ce:a2:5e:01:10:71:e8:a3:e4:07:dd:67:54:5f: 48:3f:90:62:73:c0:25:0c:a1:2a:d8:a0:b3:bf:ee:f4:c7:02: 42:01:f9:f2:c7:1c:90:a5:0f:9e:db:73:e2:1d:cb:f0:82:89: 4d:2e:6a:03:0e:09:bc:3a:c1:20:75:5b:e7:00:e8:1a:3f:13: 91:dc:d0:73:66:3b:9d:df:28:ff:47:a9:06:02:ab:e2:16:79: 82:4a:c5:1a:cc:e4:61:48:64:fb:56:3a:8c -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- MIICczCCAdSgAwIBAgICEAIwCgYIKoZIzj0EAwIwXzELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxEzAR BgNVBAgMCkNhbGlmb3JuaWExDjAMBgNVBAoMBVRlc2xhMRUwEwYDVQQLDAxUZXNs YSBNb3RvcnMxFDASBgNVBAMMC0ZvYiBSb290IENBMB4XDTE4MDkyMjAwMDYwNloX DTM5MDQwNTAwMDYwNlowNjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxDjAMBgNVBAoMBVRlc2xhMRcw FQYDVQQDDA5Gb2IgQ29tbWFuZCBDQTCBmzAQBgcqhkjOPQIBBgUrgQQAIwOBhgAE AVB5kLkqEAAbyQe98jwFokfVLOrnPtTsIFQYkP0Er3EhIUBbDI5GGTybY4meJSU5 +7Zlj6M62HX12BDTFwTvBXTOAfiajZ7BVxezFb5NymGmFUlxjppnLZgD8V7q07YK PdLDGk3IQbY/leVhk7o45Jk9m3pP1WMrTOkLPM357M5bf8rpo2YwZDAdBgNVHQ4E FgQUOCzstOYsuPZudDVWdVUFoLQukvIwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAU+yfHYUo7GcxH7tSV gJkoii7oWI4wEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCAYYwCgYI KoZIzj0EAwIDgYwAMIGIAkIB+wR8rr336gvu0HtFVKv2156JITLPetX1V0+3qpG2 9wTmmc6iXgEQceij5AfdZ1RfSD+QYnPAJQyhKtigs7/u9McCQgH58scckKUPnttz 4h3L8IKJTS5qAw4JvDrBIHVb5wDoGj8TkdzQc2Y7nd8o/0epBgKr4hZ5gkrFGszk YUhk+1Y6jA== -----END CERTIFICATE----- ``` ## Acknowledgements and Thanks * [`u/rad_example`](https://www.reddit.com/user/rad_example/), for [pointing out](https://www.reddit.com/r/teslamotors/comments/drksso/how_tesla_key_cards_actually_work/f7bcbpv/) that `O=Selp` likely referrs to [selp.fr](https://www.selp.fr/en/private-identity/). * [Martin Paljack](https://github.com/martinpaljak/) for both [GlobalPlatformPro](https://github.com/martinpaljak/GlobalPlatformPro) and [ant-javacard](https://github.com/martinpaljak/ant-javacard), both of which I find indespensible. * Jonathan Westhues, for creating the [Proxmark3](http://www.proxmark.org/), along with everyone else maintaining [the software](https://github.com/Proxmark/proxmark3) for this indespensible tool. * [Tesla](https://tesla.com/), for making such a great vehicle